![]() ![]() The group’s statement stresses that the NCPA “will arrange panel discussions,” where “unjust NCAA rules” are discussed. The #NotNCAAProperty campaign provides an influential voice to key issues, but the “or else” isn’t clear. Just like an amicus brief can influence the justices, a timely and highly publicized movement could catch their attention. That’s not to say the justices-or their clerks, many of whom were college students not long ago-are unaware of the practical stakes of the case or won’t learn of the #NotNCAAProperty movement. That case also centers on specific applications of antitrust law, rather than on social justice considerations or broader notions of fairness. Supreme Court ruling in favor of Shawne Alston is a wish that only some combination of five or more justices can grant. The #NotNCAAProperty players are sending a blunt message: Figure out a solution and make it happen soon.Ī U.S. ![]() Florida’s NIL statute goes into effect on July 1, but the NCAA could challenge it (and other state NIL laws) in court. Congress might pass a federal NIL statute, but the politics are hazy. ![]() College players are expected to be able to profit from their name, image and likeness, but that has not yet happened and the timetable for its adoption is uncertain. The #NotNCAAProperty demands come at a critical time for college sports. I believe that any system which produces that result violates my basic rights as a citizen and is inconsistent with the laws of the United States and of the several states.”įlood’s letter sparked a historic lawsuit that, while unsuccessful, inspired the eventual recognition of free agency rights for MLB and other pro athletes. “After 12 years in the Major Leagues, I do not feel that I am a piece of property to be bought and sold irrespective of my wishes. It is reminiscent of a passage from Curt Flood’s letter to MLB commissioner Bowie Kuhn in 1969, in which Flood alluded to slavery: The players’ reference to being “property” is historically significant. NCAA, thereby denying the NCAA any power to withhold equal freedoms to college athletes. The Supreme Court to rule in support of plaintiffs in Alston v. Meetings with state & federal lawmakers and President Biden’s administration to pass laws to give college athletes physical, academic and financial protections Ĥ. A meeting with NCAA President Mark Emmert ģ. NCAA rule changes to allow all athletes the freedom to secure representation and receive pay for use of our name, image and likeness by July 1 Ģ. The campaign’s goals are expressed in a press release issued by the National College Players’ Association. The #NotNCAAProperty campaign surfaced Wednesday night in tweets by Rutgers guard Geo Baker and other players. As March Madness begins, a group of basketball players from more than 15 teams have launched a social media movement to raise awareness for claims of inequitable treatment of college athletes. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |